An analysis of the accusations against socrates in platos the apology

It is always a record of what the historian believed to have taken place.

Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo

To determine whether the assertion made by the oracle was true, he began a series of inquiries and investigations. How the Charges Arose 23ca In the course of Socrates' verification of the Delphic Oracle, many people had their beliefs and values questioned and cast into doubt. Insofar as they have been influenced either by his teachings or his example, it has always been for the good.

Socrates has proclaimed himself a loyal Athenian. Thus Socrates wishes to be judged and not "forgiven" or let off for any other reason than that it is JUST to do so.

It was Anaxagoras the Clazomenian who stated that the sun and moon were only material substances. These older accusers levy two principal accusations against Socrates: Socrates responds that he does not pretend to have any knowledge of these things, nor is he interested in them.

An accessible commentary on the works of the philosopher. His statements imply that Socrates is the only one in the city of Athens who is corrupting the youth. As to the rumor that Socrates charged fees for his instruction, any one of those who had listened to him could testify to the fact that he never made any charges for his services.

Meletus appears to be the chief prosecutor, although Anytus was in all likelihood the one who instigated the charge. That which one should regard as most important is not the avoidance of death but rather the avoidance of unrighteousness. These activities earned him much admiration amongst the youth of Athens, but much hatred and anger from the people he embarrassed.

It would indicate that his teachings might constitute a threat to the conventional standards and customs of the day. Or does he insist that Socrates is an atheist and does not believe in any god at all.

This accusation claimed that Socrates charged his students for the opportunity to expand their mind. It is in essential harmony with the references to the trial that occur in Plato's other dialogs and also with the account given in Xenophon's Memorabilia. A reliable introduction to the main themes and issues on which Plato focused.

A certain man called Chaerephon had inquired of the oracle of Delphi whether there was anyone wiser than Socrates.

Analysis of Plato's Apology

His conversation with Meletus, however, is a poor example of this method, as it seems more directed toward embarrassing Meletus than toward arriving at the truth. This does not mean that he has any quarrel with the physical scientists.

After all, it is not the particular person of Socrates which is at issue here, but the activity of Philosophy itself. Because the people making these charges are numerous and energetic and have persuasive tongues, they have filled the ears of many with their loud and inveterate calumnies.

Analysis of Plato's Apology Essay

Socrates notes that he could have won his case if he had appealed to their emotioins i. A proposal of this kind would enable him to escape the death sentence and at the same time provide some justification for the verdict they had rendered. He would not attempt to escape from prison in order to save his own life even though he had ample opportunity to do so.

When the jury rejects his suggestion and sentences him to death, Socrates stoically accepts the verdict with the observation that no one but the gods know what happens after death and so it would be foolish to fear what one does not know. The state sanctioned devout worship of the Olympian gods, so the Presocratics' teaching was considered illegal and dangerous.

A deep sleep is quite peacefull, more so than most of our waking days. New Directions in Platonic Studies. Meletus must have a very poor opinion of the judges at this trial if he thinks they will not be aware of his mistake. Therefore, to disobey this command in order to save his own life would be a disgraceful thing to do.

The opposition to Socrates on the part of Meletus and his associates was based to some extent on religious grounds. Plato for the Modern Age.

Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new deities, and corrupting the youth of Athens.

Socrates' speech, however, is by no means an "apology" in our modern understanding of. Analysis Of Socrates's ' Four Accusations About Socrates ' Words | 7 Pages Four accusations about Socrates are that he commits injustice and is a busybody; he investigates things in the heavens and beneath the earth; he does not acknowledge the gods; he makes the weaker argument the stronger; he teaches this to others; he corrupts the young (Plato, Apology, 18cb, pg 47).

Apology by Plato is an argument that defends both he and his master, Socrates’, way of thinking and looking at the world and records his masters last argument in defense of philosophy - Analysis of Plato's Apology Essay introduction.

Apology Analysis

At the time this work was created. - Plato, being an admirer and student of Socrates, wrote his version of Socrates’ speech as he defended himself in court against his charges of corrupting the youth, and impiety called The Apology.

In comparison, Xenophon also wrote his version of the speech. Plato's Apology is the speech Socrates made at his trial. Socrates was charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state and corrupting the youth of Athens.

In The Apology, Socrates attempted to defend himself. He spoke in a very simple, uncomplicated manner. In Plato’s Apology of Socrates, Plato recounts the speech that Socrates gave shortly before his death, during the trial in BC in which he was charged with “corrupting the young, and by not believing in the gods in whom the city believes, also being a busybody and intervene gods business”.

An analysis of the accusations against socrates in platos the apology
Rated 4/5 based on 86 review